September 9, 2010

Comparing existing zoning to proposed - setbacks

One of the less noted but still important changes in the new draft zoning law is changes in setback distances. The Area and Bulk Table in §600 lays out setbacks that are either smaller or the same as the existing zoning requires.

As before, the old zoning districts don't correspond neatly with the new. To figure out what's changing for a specific area, you need to visit the old map (image or PDF), and figure out what zone the parcel is in. Then you need to visit the new map (image or PDF) to see where it's going.

Key:

RR
New Rural Residential
RA
New Rural Agricultural
CV
New Conservation
H
New Hamlet
CC
New Commercial
LIO
New Light Industrial/Office (LIO-A adds Adult)
RB, R-B-1, R-C, R-D
Existing zoning codes with residential base
M-A
Existing Manufacturing zone (M-AA adds Adult)
NEW (July 2010) DRAFT ZONINGEXISTING ZONING
USES RR, RA, CVH CC LIO R-B, R-B-1, R-CR-DM-A
Minimum Front Yard Setback 50'10'40'40' 70'70' (90' on
state highways)
90'
Minimum Side Yard Setback 15'0' (attached buildings)
7.5' (not attached)
0' (attached buildings)
7.5' (not attached)
15' 15'15'15'
Minimum Side Yard Setback
for accessory building
< 15' high, 200 sq. ft.
1'1'1'1' 15'15'15'
Minimum Rear Yard Setback 25'25'25'25' 25'25'15'
Minimum Rear Yard Setback
for accessory building
< 15' high, 200 sq. ft.
1'1'1'1' 15'15'15'

My guess is that the smaller setbacks for small accessory buildings will spare the Zoning Board of Appeals a lot of variance requests. One foot is a pretty small margin of error, though, so hopefully people will be careful to note where the property lines actually are.

Before you start making plans to put accessory buildings in front of your house, though, you should note that buried in the definition of "Use, Accessory" is a statement that "Unless stated otherwise in this local law, an accessory structure shall not be permitted in the front yard of a principal use."

Posted by simon at September 9, 2010 8:31 AM in
Note on photos